What do you think of more battle regions?

Add a second battleground region with different rules.
1 (25%)
Add an anarchy region, where people can fight and build as they like.
3 (75%)
Adding more battle regions is not necessary.
0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 3

Author Topic: A Second Battleground?  (Read 177 times)


  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 598
    • View Profile
Re: A Second Battleground?
« on: 2014 03 30, 02:46:43 »
So a battleground in the mesas? Hm

Personally, I don't like the idea of turning an already rare biome into a place where you destroy the terrain. However, it might make some sense to turn exactly such an area into a place where you fight for terrain, because the terrain has value. Even though stained clay is already common enough that you can't really call it rare I guess.

i agree that it's a bad idea to turn such a rare location into a battleground. unless the terrain there is somehow unique and radically changes battles, it doesn't accomplish anything except ruining the terrain.

i don't agree it makes sense that we fight over terrain that has value because that means battling becomes less of an optional part of gameplay and more necessary if people want clay. of course there is plenty of clay so this isn't as big of a problem (but don't disregard it either), but a similar battleground on the ice spikes would be an awful idea.