Author Topic: B-ong's banning 20130128  (Read 583 times)

b-ong

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 476
    • View Profile
Re: B-ong's banning 20130128
« Reply #50 on: 2013 03 16, 21:35:05 »
3. yqt never claimed the place.
4a. i felt that that page did not have enough huge images
4b. (this is the nike one i ausse) i was telling you to just do it (make the poll)
4c. yeah i get it i deleted the post
5. oh really? i still remember you shouting at me for the same reasons you do now
6. no, 5 and 6 are the same thing, not seperate. they are refering to the same idea
7. Do not insult He
8. it's called people who lose likke re-matches
9. no, Bla said he would draw borders around where we built.
10. i changed it many times
11. same concept


summary so far:

i have to work on:

not griefing--
wait i just realized i had an argument for that.

smjjames

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 302
    • View Profile
Re: B-ong's banning 20130128
« Reply #51 on: 2013 03 17, 00:19:46 »
3. yqt never claimed the place.
4a. i felt that that page did not have enough huge images
4b. (this is the nike one i ausse) i was telling you to just do it (make the poll)
4c. yeah i get it i deleted the post
5. oh really? i still remember you shouting at me for the same reasons you do now
6. no, 5 and 6 are the same thing, not seperate. they are refering to the same idea
7. Do not insult He
8. it's called people who lose likke re-matches
9. no, Bla said he would draw borders around where we built.
10. i changed it many times
11. same concept


summary so far:

i have to work on:

not griefing--
wait i just realized i had an argument for that.
Do you have an argument for everything? Seems like it. Anyways, I'll do some responses.

3. Just because it's not officially claimed doesn't give you the right to grief it like that. (IMO, just doing the cactus would have been enough of a prank back.)

4a. Did you ever think that maybe the reason why it doesn't have any huge images is because nobody likes them? Good thing that massive images don't break the forum Ubox uses.

4b. You could have used the small one and stopped right there or used a screenshot size version, not a mega image.

4c. You seem to have missed Darvs point about the images, also you didn't delete those images. Also for 4c, which post?

5 & 6. Your friend stuffhappens, who knows you irl, says you don't have ADHD. Also, you tried to use ADHD as an excuse. I have ADHD but I don't go around using it as an excuse. Having ADHD =/= being annoying as you can be annoying without having ADHD.

7. Uh, what's that all about? I thought it was just some silly/annoying thing and I thought you were referring to Dan Dixon sometimes.

9 & 10. You changed it many times? Oh really? You never made any changes to the contested claim, in fact, at one point there was an offer to split the penninsula, and did you take it? No. I was pratically screaming for you to compromise. Stuffhappens tried to compromise a couple of times, and you? No, you tried to do everything you could to keep the whole thing.

11. Oh really, and what do you think would have been the social consequence of stealing someones account name? Good thing you lost the **** password because you in fact were planning on logging into it and keeping me from getting it back. (and YES I should have registered it long ago, but that's not the point).

AND a good thing that the freenode staff couldn't do anything about it.

b-ong

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 476
    • View Profile
Re: B-ong's banning 20130128
« Reply #52 on: 2013 03 17, 02:05:49 »
3. um, kip made giant cobble pillars too, and soviet japan
4.okay i get the poitn! no more large images [reslved]
5. i said it was an excuse? i was explaining why i acted that way
7. seems liek darvince is outvoted on that one!
9-10. okay oaky! i'll check back in the older post
11. i tell you, sudden burst of being extremely mad with the knowledge makes a bad combination for me.


smjjames

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 302
    • View Profile
Re: B-ong's banning 20130128
« Reply #53 on: 2013 03 17, 02:11:00 »
I didn't mean to sound extremely mad, but yeah I'm still a little pissed about it. Well, not that pissed, but I didn't like it either :P

Probably also got into a little bit of a rant at the frustration about it.

b-ong

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 476
    • View Profile
Re: B-ong's banning 20130128
« Reply #54 on: 2013 03 17, 02:15:29 »
i'm happy words are censored here


smjjames

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 302
    • View Profile
Re: B-ong's banning 20130128
« Reply #55 on: 2013 03 17, 02:25:52 »
As for the cobble pillars and stuff, it was a prank (which doubled as a doomsday 2012 joke) which the three of us (me, kipz, and yqt) did because you and stuffhappens were refusing to compromise over the area.


b-ong

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 476
    • View Profile
Re: B-ong's banning 20130128
« Reply #56 on: 2013 03 17, 02:29:11 »
okay, pretend you and an someone (kipz would do) is battling over a land that you really, really want.
would you want yqt, me, and stuffhappens to come over and catify the area along with cobble pillers?

o, a doomsday joke. wow nice excuse smj

smjjames

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 302
    • View Profile
Re: B-ong's banning 20130128
« Reply #57 on: 2013 03 17, 02:33:35 »
The doomsday joke was an afterthought, and I think it may have been kipzs idea.

Admittedly and in hindsight, it was probably overboard since it would have been greifing but technically it wasn't officially claimed. AND it was sanctioned by yqt.

It was a stupid thing to do and at the time, we were frustrated with you two not compromising and so it was on impulse.

b-ong

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 476
    • View Profile
Re: B-ong's banning 20130128
« Reply #58 on: 2013 03 17, 02:38:02 »
hey you know what that reminds me of? me.

the only difference: i was banned, you weren't.

smjjames

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 302
    • View Profile
Re: B-ong's banning 20130128
« Reply #59 on: 2013 03 17, 02:40:45 »
Yeah I get that and honestly it was a joke that went overboard with the pillars.

It was also YOUR CHOICE to grief back, however, it seems like both sides might be at fault here to some extent.

b-ong

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 476
    • View Profile
Re: B-ong's banning 20130128
« Reply #60 on: 2013 03 17, 02:41:56 »
exactly! what i've been trying to explain from day 1! someone finalyy gets it!!  8)

yqt, come on and testify!! not sure if that's the right word but it sounds cool

*hammer sound*
« Last Edit: 2013 03 17, 02:44:20 by b-ong »

smjjames

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 302
    • View Profile
Re: B-ong's banning 20130128
« Reply #61 on: 2013 03 17, 02:44:47 »
Like what? Removing the cacti and stuff? Yqt already removed the cacti and maybe the pillars for his area.

Besides, it was YOUR choice to grief like you did, plus your immature behavior (like what you did in IRC just now :P ) is a large portion of why you got banned. The griefing isn't the single reason why.
« Last Edit: 2013 03 17, 02:47:35 by smjjames »

b-ong

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 476
    • View Profile
Re: B-ong's banning 20130128
« Reply #62 on: 2013 03 17, 02:47:03 »
yeah, the problem is that a rollback wouldn't really work, as it would erase everyone else's work
not sure why no one gave the idea of a rollback at that time

Komrage

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 589
    • View Profile
Re: B-ong's banning 20130128
« Reply #63 on: 2013 03 17, 02:58:59 »
i wasn't frustrated actually i was just bored at soviet japan



:P

b-ong

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 476
    • View Profile
Re: B-ong's banning 20130128
« Reply #64 on: 2013 03 17, 03:02:45 »
hey mudkipz you sound like rodvenio, bored all the time

Darvince

  • Guest
Re: B-ong's banning 20130128
« Reply #65 on: 2013 03 17, 05:04:36 »
protip: I don't "shout" at you, I get angry and start spamming you to stop what you're doing. And what you do doesn't change.

b-ong

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 476
    • View Profile
Re: B-ong's banning 20130128
« Reply #66 on: 2013 03 17, 13:13:38 »
and you accuse me of spamming


Darvince

  • Guest
Re: B-ong's banning 20130128
« Reply #67 on: 2013 03 18, 04:28:54 »
Because you do, I don't exclusively accuse you of spamming. You can accuse other people of something that you do yourself, as long as you don't say that you don't do that thing.

b-ong

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 476
    • View Profile
Re: B-ong's banning 20130128
« Reply #68 on: 2013 03 25, 13:14:51 »
Yeah I get that and honestly it was a joke that went overboard with the pillars.

It was also YOUR CHOICE to grief back, however, it seems like both sides might be at fault here to some extent.
yeah, so they should have the same punishment.


yqt1001 reply to me!!
This. Is. Sparta!!!. Injustice!!

yqt1001

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 338
    • View Profile
Re: B-ong's banning 20130128
« Reply #69 on: 2013 03 25, 15:37:33 »
This. Is. Sparta!!!. Injustice!!

Don't use that quote wrong, Sparta was one of the most just societies in the ancient world.

b-ong

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 476
    • View Profile
Re: B-ong's banning 20130128
« Reply #70 on: 2013 03 25, 16:02:13 »
*psy*
fyi you speeled justice wrong

also, just answer the question :P

Yeah I get that and honestly it was a joke that went overboard with the pillars.

It was also YOUR CHOICE to grief back, however, it seems like both sides might be at fault here to some extent.
yeah, so they should have the same punishment.

right?

smjjames

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 302
    • View Profile
Re: B-ong's banning 20130128
« Reply #71 on: 2013 03 25, 16:23:18 »
*psy*
fyi you speeled justice wrong


Go look up the word just in a dictionary, he spelled it just fine the way he used the word.

And yes Yqt, answer because you're the one who sanctioned the first soviet japan thing.
« Last Edit: 2013 03 25, 16:25:39 by smjjames »

yqt1001

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 338
    • View Profile
Re: B-ong's banning 20130128
« Reply #72 on: 2013 03 25, 19:11:56 »
And yes Yqt, answer because you're the one who sanctioned the first soviet japan thing.

I am not wasting more of my time going over the reasons again. I have said it enough.

Not my fault you guys don't understand it.

b-ong

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 476
    • View Profile
Re: B-ong's banning 20130128
« Reply #73 on: 2013 03 25, 20:02:44 »
where

Edit: i found it! it was because stuffhappens was a good friend. that was why he sanctioned it.
but i don't really get it

if your good friend was winning the territorial battle, then why make it uninhabitable?
« Last Edit: 2013 03 27, 18:18:31 by b-ong »

Bla

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,330
  • Not to be confused with lapis lazuli.
  • Location: Sikrit Blabunker Blasement
    • View Profile
Re: B-ong's banning 20130128
« Reply #74 on: 2013 03 30, 19:29:38 »
B-ong, your main reason for being banned currently is no longer what you did in Blacraft. It is how you continue to treat Yqt. Example are threatening with killing him in Blacraft, spamming him on IRC and accusing him of rude things without stating any reason.

Please change this immediately if you want to ever get unbanned.

b-ong

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 476
    • View Profile
Re: B-ong's banning 20130128
« Reply #75 on: 2013 03 30, 21:08:38 »
Okie

FYI I stopped spams on yqt, and can you like tell him to not kill mee if I ever join again? Like I was kewled every time I saw him.

*he saw me

smjjames

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 302
    • View Profile
Re: B-ong's banning 20130128
« Reply #76 on: 2013 03 30, 21:29:42 »
B-ong, your main reason for being banned currently is no longer what you did in Blacraft. It is how you continue to treat Yqt. Example are threatening with killing him in Blacraft, spamming him on IRC and accusing him of rude things without stating any reason.

Please change this immediately if you want to ever get unbanned.
Okie

FYI I stopped spams on yqt, and can you like tell him to not kill mee if I ever join again? Like I was kewled every time I saw him.

*he saw me

It is also your continued immature behavior in the IRC.

b-ong

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 476
    • View Profile
Re: B-ong's banning 20130128
« Reply #77 on: 2013 05 12, 16:02:51 »
note of apology to yqt

MUST READ WHILE LISTENING TO
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RyCTGhKWtBs
Spoiler (hover to show)
« Last Edit: 2013 05 12, 16:05:17 by b-ong »

Darvince

  • Guest
Re: B-ong's banning 20130128
« Reply #78 on: 2013 05 20, 02:40:22 »
no it's your personality nobody gives a scheiß about kinar anymore

b-ong

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 476
    • View Profile
Re: B-ong's banning 20130128
« Reply #79 on: 2013 07 13, 11:59:45 »
wait have to push it up so i can party with the other bans :)
and damnit, the date is not spaced

yqt1001

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 338
    • View Profile
Re: B-ong's banning 20130128
« Reply #80 on: 2013 07 13, 18:36:45 »
I feel like **** has matured enough that he should be unbanned. However, stricter than normal rules should apply, and pending that he breaks a rule (ie, PVP without permission from both parties, greifing (modification of blocks outside of his own territory without permission, includes Guodesia); UBSR rules should not apply here) he will go back into a state of ban.

Not sure what Bla thinks, but I'm guessing he will agree.

smjjames

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 302
    • View Profile
Re: B-ong's banning 20130128
« Reply #81 on: 2013 07 13, 18:51:44 »
I feel like **** has matured enough that he should be unbanned. However, stricter than normal rules should apply, and pending that he breaks a rule (ie, PVP without permission from both parties, greifing (modification of blocks outside of his own territory without permission, includes Guodesia); UBSR rules should not apply here) he will go back into a state of ban.

Not sure what Bla thinks, but I'm guessing he will agree.

What about spelunking? Just making sure it is consistent because "modification of blocks outside of his own territory without permission, includes Guodesia" could conflict with that, although I do know exactly what you're talking about.

Edit: Just to be clear, I don't have anything against him spelunking, I just thought it might conflict with that particular statement.
« Last Edit: 2013 07 13, 19:01:38 by smjjames »

Bla

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,330
  • Not to be confused with lapis lazuli.
  • Location: Sikrit Blabunker Blasement
    • View Profile
Re: B-ong's banning 20130128
« Reply #82 on: 2013 07 13, 19:55:12 »
I agree with unbanning b-ong. I don't see any reason to set stricter rules for now, just warning b-ong to be very careful, I would rather judge based on specific situations.
It's not his fault if someone accidentally punches him.

Darvince

  • Guest
Re: B-ong's banning 20130128
« Reply #83 on: 2013 07 14, 04:55:29 »
mfw people can get unbanned from blacraft

b-ong

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 476
    • View Profile
Re: B-ong's banning 20130128
« Reply #84 on: 2013 07 18, 16:37:10 »
do you think we should put the unban date, Bla or does it not matter

Bla

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,330
  • Not to be confused with lapis lazuli.
  • Location: Sikrit Blabunker Blasement
    • View Profile
Re: B-ong's banning 20130128
« Reply #85 on: 2013 07 18, 16:56:09 »
Idc, you can do it if you want to, in any case our posts show when stuff happened.