Blacraft Forum

Public Forums => Blacraft General => Topic started by: Komrage on 2013 12 28, 18:08:19

Title: Infrastructure Usage Treaty Proposal
Post by: Komrage on 2013 12 28, 18:08:19
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RTc2s1Bf4_BbgzCZS9whlVdIxEJPNiLSInKJCrFsinM/edit
Title: Re: Infrastructure Usage Treaty Proposal
Post by: Bla on 2013 12 28, 21:20:09
The treaty seems reasonable. I was considering a similar treaty where UBSR-membership would be based on common ownership of infrastructure (such as in the treaty) rather than the public and collective storages, with that being an optional, closer stage of cooperation.
Title: Re: Infrastructure Usage Treaty Proposal
Post by: Komrage on 2014 07 02, 03:07:56
i haven't changed anything. do you want to sign this?

/me signs
Title: Re: Infrastructure Usage Treaty Proposal
Post by: Bla on 2014 07 02, 12:57:27
* Bla signs
Title: Re: Infrastructure Usage Treaty Proposal
Post by: smjjames on 2014 07 06, 13:47:02
*smjjames signs using calligraphy
Title: Re: Infrastructure Usage Treaty Proposal
Post by: Darvince on 2014 07 07, 02:41:49
BEDS?? I build my stuff with the intent that anyone who comes along may use it, whether they're in SKA or not.
Title: Re: Infrastructure Usage Treaty Proposal
Post by: Bla on 2014 07 07, 11:00:54
BEDS?? I build my stuff with the intent that anyone who comes along may use it, whether they're in SKA or not.
What does this have to do with anything?? The treaty does not even mention SKA

Is it because you've come to complain and argue about UBSR again? Well, just because the treaty mentions something, it doesn't mean it's already banned, those were merely examples written by someone who's not in UBSR. Sleeping centers in UBSR can be used by anyone. So calm down and get off your high horse ok.
Title: Re: Infrastructure Usage Treaty Proposal
Post by: Darvince on 2014 07 07, 12:11:22
ok I just saw beds and was like "what is this was i not allowed to use desertopian beds this whole time"